|
May / June 2009

Human Factors
Home Medical Equipment Rentals and Instructions for Use
By William A. Hyman, ScD, PE
Home use of medical
equipment continues to grow, including both equipment expressly
designed for the lay user and equipment adopted for home use but where
the layman may not be the original intended user. Some of this
equipment is rented to the home user directly and some through the
insurer. Because of the increase in home use, there has been increasing
attention to the design of this equipment with respect to its usability
by non-professional users. This attention typically focuses on the user
interface, with the goal of making it less complex, more intuitive, and
more clearly labeled, therefore enhancing effective use and reducing
"use error." The term "use error" is preferred to "user error" because
the former identifies only what happened while the latter implies
blame. In this regard, the principles of human factors, or human
factors engineering, assert that the identification of potential errors
and their mitigation is a design problem, and that design must
therefore seek to eliminate errors, and warn against them only when the
adverse situation cannot be reasonably designed out. Good design for
home use might also include making a device more "décor friendly."
In addition to the actual design of the equipment,
all medical devices must have "adequate directions for use" based on
good design and marketing practices, legal expectations, and Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) regulations (2003, April 4). The FDA has
addressed the writing of instructions aimed at the lay user (1993) as
well as for medical professional (2003, August 28). In this regard, the
FDA definition of adequate directions for use for over-the-counter
devices is "directions under which the layman can use a device safely
and for the purposes for which it is intended." The instructions for
use (IFU) must also include frequency and duration of administration
and preparation for use such as any adjustments to be made. It is also
common and necessary for IFUs to include a variety of warnings about
unsafe practices, as well as contraindications for use of the device,
adverse reactions and inherent hazards. In addition, IFUs will
typically include contact information for the manufacturer as well as
warranty information. The IFU may also have troubleshooting guides and
other information that can be helpful to the end user. Devices for
professional use have separate labeling requirements. The situation for
prescribed, home-use devices is more complex in that the prescription
requirement implies that a professional intermediary is required, yet
the patient or their caregivers are the actual end users. Many such
devices include distinct professional and end user IFUs. There are also
devices for which the FDA provides specific labeling requirements (e.g.
devices containing latex) or guidance documents (e.g. laboratory test
kits).
Joint Commission Standards
In addition to FDA requirements for
manufacturers, The Joint Commission (n.d.) addresses Patient Equipment
Management in its homecare accreditations standards. While not
specifically requiring the provision of IFUs, doing so is certainly
consistent with EC.6.30: The organization plans for effective
selection, delivery, set-up, and maintenance of equipment and supplies
provided to patients; EC.6.40: The organization appropriately delivers medical equipment provided to patients; and EC.6.50: Medical equipment provided to patients is set up appropriately in the patient's home. A relevant performance element under EC.6.30 is the CMS Quality Standard: The
supplier implements an equipment and item management program that
promotes the safe use of equipment and items and minimizes safety risks
and hazards both for its staff and for beneficiaries. Under EC.6.50 is found CMS Quality Standard: The supplier provides all items that are necessary to operate the equipment or item. Appropriate instructions must logically be included here.
Rental and Loaner Device IFUs
When a medical device is purchased new, the IFU
and all other paperwork can be expected to be packaged in the box with
the device, and therefore it will reach the end user in most cases.
Rental and loaner devices may present a more challenging situation in
that the IFU document may become separated from the product and not be
provided to the end user by the actual supplier. This may be as a
matter of policy and practice, or it may be by omission. Policy or
practice may arise because only one IFU was originally received from
the manufacturer with each item, and it has been retained (or lost) by
the rental supplier. Even if the IFU was once provided to the end
users, there may be a problem with recovering the IFU when the rental
equipment is returned. Thus the supplier would have to continually or
frequently replace the IFU. However these realities cannot offset the
fundamental safety principle and good practice that dictates that the
manufacturer's IFU must be provided to the end user if they are to have
access to all of the information that the manufacturer determined was
part of the "adequate directions for use."
Instead of providing the actual IFU, some rental
suppliers have chosen to prepare their own simplified version, or to
rely on verbal instructions upon delivery. In either case, these
abbreviated instructions tend to be limited to the fundamental
how-to-operate aspects of the device and not include the complete
warning and caution information contained in the original IFU. For
example, how to move the side rails on a bed up and down is certainly
valuable and necessary information, but providing just these
instructions does not include the information on entrapment or fall
hazards that may exist in the design and be addressed (whether
adequately or inadequately) by the manufacturer's instructions.
Furthermore verbal instructions, even if acknowledged by the
responsible party in the home, may or may not be really understood, or
if initially understood, may not be remembered or effectively
transferred to other caregivers. In addition, delivery personnel may
not be well enough trained to adequately provide clear and complete
verbal instructions. Availability of the manufacturer's written
instructions may also demonstrate discrepancies between what the user
was told, or thinks they were told, and what the instructions say. This
can be a good stimulus for seeking clarification and preventing harm.
Another unacceptable excuse for not providing the
actual IFU might be that IFU is "too complicated" for the end user and
that therefore simplified instructions are better. If in fact the IFU
is too complicated, then might the device also be too complicated for
that user? In addition, this judgment puts the rental supplier in the
position of substituting their assessment of appropriate directions for
use for those of the manufacturer. This is a perilous exercise. While
safe and effective use is the primary goal, post-incident risk
management also suggests that failing to provide an IFU that contained
warnings relevant to an adverse event that has already occurred will be
challenging to explain and justify. If it is felt necessary to provide
supplemental abbreviated instructions, they should include the
instruction to "Read and understand the manufacturer's Instructions for
Use." In some cases, home health providers may be in a position to
supplement and reinforce instructions, and to identify safety concerns
in the home, but only if they are themselves thoroughly familiar with
the relevant IFUs.
The IFU for a device designed for home use will
also typically include a consumer contact telephone number so that the
end user can communicate directly with the manufacturer as well as with
their medical professionals and the rental supplier. This access to the
manufacturer can provide added, and perhaps more detailed, support with
respect to the user's questions. The warranty information will
initially not be relevant to a rented device, but can become important
if the device transfers from rental to ownership as a result of the
amount of rent paid over a period of time. Depending on the clarity of
the communications from the supplier, the consumer may or may not
understand that they have become the owner of the equipment, nor what
portion of the original warranty period, if any, is being transferred
to them. In the worst example of this transfer situation, the new owner
may not know they have in fact become the owner until the next time
they contact the rental supplier with a problem. At that point they may
be told that they now own the device, and that the warranty has expired.
It should be clear that home users of medical
devices need clear and complete written instructions on the safe and
effective use of their home medical devices. A primary source for this
information is the IFU provided by the manufacturer of the device, and
there is no rational or compelling reason or excuse for this IFU not to
be provided to the end user of rental equipment. The end consumer also
needs clear written information on whom to contact with questions on
use and on the commercial aspects of their transaction including
conversion from rental to ownership and warranty status. In addition to
being fundamentally logical, the simple concept of users needing the
IFU is consistent with elements of the FDA's guide for home users,
which includes "Read your patient education information," "Keep Instructions for Use close to your device," and "Read your instructions for taking care of your device and follow them" (FDA, 1993).
William Hyman is a professor of biomedical
engineering at Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas. His
primary areas of professional activity are in medical device design,
system safety, and human factors. He is president of the ACCE
Healthcare Technology Foundation, an editor of the Journal of Clinical Engineering,
and received the ACCE's Lifetime Achievement Award in 2009. He has
served as a consultant for FDA, the National Science Foundation, the
National Institutes of Health, and medical device companies. He holds
memberships in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM),
the American College of Clinical Engineering, the Association for the
Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, the Biomedical Engineering
Society, and the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society technical group
on medical systems and functionally impaired populations. He is also a
member of the Dallas District FDA/Industry Coalition. Dr. Hyman is a
registered professional engineer in Texas and may be contacted at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
References
FDA. (2003, April 4). Device advice, labeling requirements. Available at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/devadvice/33.html. (Accessed September 1, 2008.)
FDA. (2003, August 28). Home healthcare medical devices: A checklist. Available at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/cdrhhhc/brochure-checklist.html. (Accessed September 1, 2008.)
FDA. (1993, August). Write it right: Recommendations for
developing user instruction manuals for medical devices used in home
health care. Available at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/897.pdf. (Accessed September 1, 2008.)
The Joint Commission. Home medical equipment supplement. Available at http://www.jointcommission.org/AccreditationPrograms/HomeCare/hme_supplement.htm. (Accessed September 2, 2008.)
|